|
Bookreview |
|
| |
The number of books that defend the Christian faith on basis of clear
historical and rational arguments – as opposed say to theology or
emotion – continues to grow.
Recent classics you might have seen on the Crossroads book table
include the – highly recommended - trilogy by former atheist and
journalist at the Chicago Tribune, Lee Strobel: "The Case for Christ",
"The Case for Faith" and "The Case for a Creator".
The only trouble with this proliferation of publications - especially
if you want to present a seeking friend with something to consider - is
that no single book covers the whole subject. In “I don’t
have enough faith to be an atheist”, Norman Geisler and Frank
Turek try to meet this demand in around 400 pages. The result is an
exceptional work, which presents a convincing argument that
Christianity requires the least faith of all religions (including no
religion at all!) because it is the most reasonable. Geisler and Turek
lay out the evidence for truth, God, the Bible and Jesus being who he
said he was in logical order and in a readable and attractive style.
One of the issues tackled head on is the popular modern fallacy that
there is no such thing as truth… A vital one to all of us who
find ourselves defending the concept of Jesus being ‘the way, the
truth and life’. The subject of Intelligent Design – very
much in the news right now in Holland since the Dutch Education
minister proposed this being discussed in schools – is covered in
great depth. Geisler and Turek’s arguments on the differences
between macro and micro evolution - “From the Goo to You via the
Zoo” - are especially revealing. And they come up with some great
quotes, including this gem from Ron Carlson: “In grammar school
they taught me that a frog turning into a prince was a fairytale. In
University they taught me that a frog turning into a prince was a fact."
The second part of “I don’t have enough faith to be an
atheist”, starts by focusing on the historic reliability of the
New Testament. The section on early and eyewitness testimony is very
clear cut, not to mention persuasive. Having established the
credentials of the New Testament, which of course says that Jesus
claimed to be God, the authors then specifically analyse this claim.
Key areas covered include the prophecies fulfilled by Jesus, his
seamless life and miraculous deeds, and his prediction and
accomplishment of his resurrection.
|
|
|
|
|
|